Fukaya

Fukaya v. Daiso California LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20233:23-cv-00099California2,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAKIKO FUKAYA, Case No. 23-cv-00099-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS

v. AND TO STRIKE

DAISO CALIFORNIA LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff brings consumer protection claims related to Daiso’s failure to label its products as containing tree nuts, a common allergen. (Dkt. No. 1.) Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss and to strike. (Dkt. No. 18.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on May 11, 2023, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Food allergies can provoke life-threatening response, including anaphylaxis, from the body’s immune system. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶ 13.) Allergies to tree nuts, such as walnuts, almonds, hazelnuts, pecans, cashews, and pistachios, are fairly common. (Id. ¶ 15.) Along with peanuts and shellfish, tree nuts are one of the allergens most often linked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.