Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 23-cv-00598-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Re: Dkt. No. 3 11 Defendant.

12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jane Doe alleges that the Regents of the University of California (“UC Regents”) violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (“CIPA”), Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (“CIMA”), and right to privacy under the California Constitution and the common law, breached an express or implied contract, and is liable for unjust enrichment because of its use of a tracking technology called the Meta Pixel. UC Regents moves to dismiss, asserting that as a public entity it is immune from liability for several of plaintiff’s causes of action and contending that plaintiff failed to state claim for each of the remaining causes of action. On some claims—CIPA, privacy under the…