Oh

Oh v. Sunvalleytek International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20233:22-cv-00866California1,665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID OH, Case No. 22-cv-00866-SVK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

SUNVALLEYTEK INTERNATIONAL, Re: Dkt. No.

INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 In this putative class action, Plaintiff David Oh alleges that Defendant Sunvalleytek International, Inc., which makes, sells and markets consumer electronics, paid for high ratings and reviews of its products on websites like Amazon.com without disclosing this information to consumers. Dkt. 26 (First Amended Complaint or “FAC”). All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 6, 9. Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction that would freeze certain assets of Defendant and require Defendant to provide an accounting. Dkt. 41; see also Dkt. 41-9. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.