Clements

Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20235:22-cv-07512California2,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BRADFORD ARTHUR CLEMENTS, Case No. 5:22-cv-07512-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT

T-MOBILE USA, INC, et al., Re: ECF No. 23 Defendants.

Petitioner Bradford Clements (“Clements” or “Petitioner”) moves for leave to amend his “Petition to Compel T-Mobile to Submit to Arbitration Governed by California Law in Santa Clara County, and in Accord with the Parties’ Written Agreement, and to Stay the Pending Texas Arbitration” (“Petition”). ECF No. 1. The Court heard oral arguments on May 11, 2023. I. BACKGROUND Petitioner Clements filed this action on November 30, 2022 petitioning this Court, in part, to compel T-Mobile to “concede to the AAA that the arbitration venue must be in Santa Clara County, California” and “concede to the AAA that California law must apply.” ECF No. 1 at 2. Clements was a customer of T-Mobile from 2019 until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.