McKay

McKay v. Sazerac Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20233:23-cv-00522California7,654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTOPHER MCKAY, Case No. 23-cv-00522-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS, AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST

SAZERAC COMPANY, INC., FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendant. Docket Nos. 15-

12 13 Plaintiff Christopher McKay, on behalf of a putative class, filed suit against Defendant Sazerac Company, Inc. (“Sazerac”) for Sazerac’s labeling and marketing of its mini bottles of Fireball malt beverages, which allegedly deceive customers into purchasing Fireball Malt by using labeling, wording, and packaging similar to that of Fireball Whisky. Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”). Specifically, Mr. McKay claims (1) violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), California Civil Code § 1750, et seq., (2) violation of the False Advertising, Business and Professions Code (“FAL”) § 17500, et seq., (3) common law fraud, deceit, and/or misrepresentation, (4) unlawful, unfair, and fraudulent trade…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.