Gilmore
Gilmore v. Safe Box Logistics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JANICE GILMORE, Case No. 21-cv-06917-AMO (RMI)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: SECOND DISCOVERY
v. LETTER BRIEF
SAFE BOX LOGISTICS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 107 Defendants.
13 Now pending before the court are a series of discovery disputes presented by way of a second jointly-filed letter brief (Ltr. Br. 2 (dkt. 107)) which presents one new issue and rehashes a pair of already-decided issues with new arguments. The undersigned finds that the Parties have had adequate opportunity to brief their positions; as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds that oral argument would not aid the court’s decision-making process, and that this matter is suitable for disposition on the papers. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s request to compel the production of the material in question is denied. Plaintiff once again seeks an order…