Adom

Adom v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20234:22-cv-07150California539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BILAL ADOM, Case No. 22-cv-07150-JSW

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

v. AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION;

GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

CDCR, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 13, 15 Defendants.

Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights case. Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and a preliminary injunction. Prior to granting a preliminary injunction, notice to the adverse party is required. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1). A TRO may be granted without written or oral notice to the adverse party or that party's attorney only if: (1) it clearly appears from specific facts shown by affidavit or by the verified complaint that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result to the applicant before the adverse party or the party's attorney can be heard in opposition, and (2) the applicant's attorney certifies in writing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.