Kelley

Kelley v. AW Distributing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20234:20-cv-06942California459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN KELLEY, et al., Case No. 20-cv-06942-JSW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DAIHO SANGYO,

v. INC.’S MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

AW DISTRIBUTING, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 295 Defendants.

12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion for reconsideration filed by Daiho Sangyo, Inc. (“Daiho”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. Daiho moves the Court to reconsider the Order denying Daiho’s motion for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ negligence claim. Under Local Rule 7-9(b), reconsideration may be sought, inter alia, if there was a manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments that were presented to the Court before issuance of such order. N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-9(b)(3). Daiho argues the Court manifestly failed to consider dispositive legal arguments because: (1) it concluded that Wisconsin Statute section 895.046 applied to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.