Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Apttus Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20233:21-cv-01844California4,206 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

YANIRA GONZALEZ,

Case No. 21-cv-01844-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS PURSUANT TO APTTUS CORPORATION, FRCP 12(f) AND 12(b)(6) 10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 88

12 I. INTRODUCTION On January 31, 2023, California’s Civil Rights Department (“CRD”) issued a right-to-sue letter permitting Plaintiff, Yanira Gonzalez, pro se, to bring a civil action asserting employment discrimination claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) against her former employer, Apttus Corporation (“Apttus”). Accordingly, this Court gave Gonzalez leave to amend her complaint to add “only the newly exhausted claims[.]” Dkt. no. 86. Gonzalez subsequently filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), which is the operative complaint. Presently before the Court is Defendant Apttus Corporation’s Motion to Strike or Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(f) and 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). A hearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.