LeGrand

LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20233:22-cv-05815California4,282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONDALISA LEGRAND, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Condalisa LeGrand brings this putative class action against Abbott Laboratories, alleging certain statements on the labels of Abbott’s Ensure® nutrition drinks are false and misleading. Abbott now moves for partial dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), arguing LeGrand lacks standing to assert claims based on one of its label statements, “All-in-One blend to support your health.” ECF No. 40. LeGrand filed an Opposition (ECF No. 44) and Abbott filed a Reply (ECF No. 45). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the May 18, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.