Richter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA RICHTER, Case No. 19-cv-08300-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT,

DENYING MOTION TO ADD NEW

LISA AUSMUS, et al., CLAIMS, LIFTING STAY, AND

SETTING TRIAL

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 178, 182

12 Following my April 6, 2023 Order, the only claims remaining in this case are: 13 Richter’s 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claims for denial of procedural due process and violation of the Takings Clause; both are based on the defendants’ apparent delay in processing her industrial disability retirement (“IDR”) application. As noted below, the only damages that appear to be at issue – based on Richter’s often-amended pleadings – are interest from the last day she was on the City of Oakland’s payroll (around March 28, 2020) through the date her IDR benefits were granted (in January 2023) and perhaps some limited other damages that plaintiff suffered as a result of the City’s delay…