Rubalcava

Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20235:20-cv-04191California1,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTION CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., INTERROGATORIES Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 175

13 Plaintiff Lionel Rubalcava and defendants City of San Jose, Joseph Perez, Topui Fonua, Steven Spillman, Rafael Nieves, and Ramon Avalos (collectively, “Defendants”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning Defendants responses to three of Mr. Rubalcava’s contention interrogatories. Dkt. No. 175. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Defendants must fairly respond to Mr. Rubalcava’s contention interrogatories. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Mr. Rubalcava asserts claims for violations of his federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.