Pagaling

Pagaling v. Trihn

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20235:23-cv-00432California1,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No. 23-cv-00432 BLF

MICHAEL JO SEPH PAGALING,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING

Plaintiff, PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT 13 v.

DR. TRIHN, Defendant. (Docket Nos. 2, 3, 4)

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the Napa State Hospital (“NSH”), filed a civil rights complaint against Dr. Trihn Doe. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff filed various motions, Dkt. Nos. 2, 3, 4, and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis which will be addressed in a separate order, Dkt. No. 5. 22 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.