Rubalcava
Rubalcava v. City Of San Jose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 LIONEL RUBALCAVA, Case No. 20-cv-04191-BLF (VKD)
Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE v. TO DEFENDANTS' REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSIONS
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 176 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Lionel Rubalcava and defendants City of San Jose, Joseph Perez, Topui Fonua, Steven Spillman, Rafael Nieves, and Ramon Avalos (collectively, “Defendants”) ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning Mr. Rubalcava’s responses to several of Defendants’ requests for admissions. Dkt. No. 176. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that Mr. Rubalcava’s responses to Defendants’ Requests for Admissions Nos. 27-44 satisfy the requirements of Rule 36. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Mr. Rubalcava asserts claims for violations of his federal constitutional rights…