Boskovich

Du Bois v. Boskovich

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20234:21-cv-03224California1,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BEKAH DU BOIS, Case No. 21-cv-03224-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

ANTHONY BOSKOVICH, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Anthony Boskovich’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 62. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. In February 2023, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to strike under California’s anti- SLAPP statute. Dkt. No. 60 at 2–8. As the prevailing party, Defendant now moves for attorneys’ fees under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16(c)(1). In her opposition brief, Plaintiff Bekah DuBois indicates that she lacks the ability to pay any amount of attorneys’ fees. See Dkt. No. 65 at 2. But the award of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.