Ashker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 TODD ASHKER, et al., Case No. 09-cv-05796-CW (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ GLOBAL

v. ENFORCEMENT MOTION

MATHEW CATE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1682 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is “Plaintiffs’ Enforcement Motion to Remedy Proven Constitutional Violations” (dkt. 1682). Defendants have filed a response (dkt. 1743) and Plaintiffs have filed a reply (dkt. 1804). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the undersigned finds the matter to be suitable for disposition without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is denied. In August of 2015, the Parties executed their Settlement Agreement (cited as “SA”) (dkt. 424-2) in this case. In pertinent part, the agreement provides that “[i]f Plaintiffs contend that current and ongoing violations of the Eighth Amendment or the Due Process Clause of…