Johnson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20235:21-cv-01849California2,261 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE APRIL 17, 2023

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE RULE 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 96 Defendants.

13 The parties ask the Court to resolve their dispute concerning Topics 1, 4-6, and 10-12 in plaintiff Kyle Johnson’s Rule 30(b)(6) notice of deposition to defendant City of San Jose (“City”). Dkt. No. 96. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court orders the City to provide testimony responsive to Topics 1 (as narrowed), 4-6, 10, and 11. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Johnson alleges that he was injured when SJPD Officer James Adgar fired a projectile at him during the George Floyd protests in San Jose, California in late May 2020. Dkt. No. 73. On March 16, 2021, he filed this action against the City and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.