Lam Sing v. Sunrise Senior Management, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 26, 20233:23-cv-00733California2,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANA KEI LAM SING, Plaintiff, No. C 23-00733 WHA

v.

SUNRISE SENIOR MANAGEMENT, ORDER RE MOTION TO REMAND INC., INDIVIDUAL T.F., and DOES 1–20, AND STIPULATION FOR BINDING

ARBITRATION

Defendants.

INTRODUCTION This action involves plaintiff employee of a defendant senior living facility who alleges that a resident of that facility, also a defendant, sexually assaulted her. Plaintiff asserts fourteen claims based on California statutes and common law tort. Plaintiff and defendant employer have stipulated to binding arbitration, and plaintiff now moves to remand this action to state court. Because this district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this action, plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. STATEMENT Defendant Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Virginia. It operates the Sunrise facility in San Mateo, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.