Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GREGOR LESNIK and STJEPAN Case No. 16-cv-01120-BLF

PAPES,

9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT ON CLAIMS 2 AND 3; v. GRANTING RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES ON EISENMANN SE, et al., CLAIM 9; AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE RULE 54 MOTION FOR Defendants. ATTORNEYS’ FEES 13 [Re: ECF 613, 614, 615]

16 Before the Court are three motions filed by Plaintiff Stjepan Papes (“Papes”): (1) a renewed motion for default judgment on Claims 2 and 3, see Mot. for Def. Jud., ECF 613; (2) an administrative motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of a prior order denying attorneys’ fees in connection with Claim 9, see Admin. Mot., ECF 615; and (3) a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs on Claims 2, 3, and 9 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, see Fees Mot., ECF 614. Plaintiff…