Rothschild

Rothschild v. Gildred

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 1, 20233:23-cv-01713California342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS ETIENNE ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 23-cv-01713-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STEPHANIE ANN GILDRED, et al., Re: ECF No. 6 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Thomas Etienne Rothschild filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on April 10, 2023. ECF No. 2. On May 2, 2023, the Court denied Mr. Rothschild’s IFP application without prejudice because his application was incomplete as filed. ECF No. 6. Mr. Rothschild had until May 19, 2023 to submit an amended IFP application. Id. No amended IFP application has been filed, although the Court does take judicial notice of the fact that Mr. Rothschild filed amended IFP applications in the related case pending before this Court, Rothschild v. The Pacific Companies, No. 23-cv-01721-LJC, ECF Nos. 11, 12. See Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 442 F.3d 741, 746, n.6 (9th Cir. 2006) (federal courts “may take judicial notice of court filings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.