In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE LYFT INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 19-cv-02690-HSG ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE

PRETRIAL DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 365 11 2 In May 2023, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler denied state-plaintiff objectors’ request for S || discovery. See Dkt. No. 362. State-plaintiff objectors then filed a motion for relief from Judge || Beeler’s non-dispositive pretrial discovery order. See Dkt. No. 365. A pretrial order by a a || magistrate judge will be reversed only if it “is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C.

= || § 636(b)(1)(A). The Court has carefully reviewed Judge Beeler’s order, state-plaintiffs’ motion, || lead Plaintiff's opposition, and the relevant legal authorities. Judge Beeler’s order is well- || reasoned and thorough. The Court affirms the non-dispositive order because it is…