Flowers
Flowers v. Maxfield
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FERDINAND FLOWERS,
Case No. 22-cv-04935 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v.
14 CAPT. APRIL MAXFIELD, et al., Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner currently confined at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a correctional officer and two mental health care providers at SQSP. Dkt. No. 1. The Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend to attempt to state sufficient facts to state a cognizable claim. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff was also advised of a potential joinder issue. Id. Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint which names only one Defendant, Capt. April Maxfield. Dkt. No. 12. 25 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify…