Joseph

Joseph v. Montegrande

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 2, 20235:22-cv-03576California2,630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALONZO JOSEPH, Case No. 22-cv-03576-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF SERVICE

v.

FAYE MONTEGRANDE, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 making several claims against several defendants about his medical care. ECF 1. The Court dismissed some of the defendants and some of the claims with prejudice, and provided plaintiff with the opportunity to file an amended complaint describing how defendant Montegrande failed to treat his Hepatitis C. ECF 6. Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (FAC) on September 6, 2022. ECF 9. The FAC is now before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Service of the FAC will be ordered on defendant Montegrande. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.