A.H.

A.H. v. Anthem Blue Cross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 5, 20234:22-cv-07660California2,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 A.H., Case No. 22-cv-07660-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

ANTHEM BLUE CROSS, Re: Dkt. No. 47 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Anthem Blue Cross’s motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 47. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff A.H. initially filed this action individually and on behalf of B.H., a minor, in the District of Utah. See Dkt. No. 2 (“Compl.”). The case was transferred in December 2022, Dkt. No. 27, at which point Defendant filed a renewed motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 47. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant wrongly denied coverage under a health benefits plan for treatment that B.H. received at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.