Coelho

Coelho v. Hyundai Motor America

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20235:22-cv-07670California4,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NADIA COELHO, Case No. 22-cv-07670-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS; DENYING MOTION TO

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, STRIKE Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 6]

12 This is a lemon law case involving an allegedly defective 2017 Hyundai Sonata that Plaintiff Nadia Coelho purchased in 2021. Coelho asserts claims under state and federal law against Defendant Hyundai Motor America (“HMA”) for alleged breaches of express and implied warranties. HMA moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss Coelho’s claims and moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) to strike Coelho’s requests for rescission and attorney’s fees in relation to her claim under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Mot., ECF No. 6; see also Reply, ECF No. 14. Coelho opposes HMA’s motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 13. This matter is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.