Jones
Jones v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMANDA JONES, Case No. 15-cv-02726-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR
v. JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER Re: Dkt. No. 413 CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s (“Amtrak’s”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. ECF No. 413. Plaintiff Amanda Jones filed an Opposition (ECF No. 420) and Amtrak filed a Reply (ECF No. 421). The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the June 8, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ positions, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS the motion for the following reasons.1 II. BACKGROUND The Court borrows the following summary of the facts from its October 10, 2019 summary judgment order. ECF No. 197. On August 25,…