Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. Greenpeace International
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION v. REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ATTORNEY FEE MOTIONS AND GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al., STRIKING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendants. Re: ECF No. 545, 549 Defendants Daniel Brindis, Greenpeace International, Greenpeace, Inc., Amy Moas, and Rolf Skar (collectively “Greenpeace”) filed an administrative motion regarding a briefing schedule on attorney’s fees motions. ECF No. 545. Greenpeace requests that “the Court to maintain jurisdiction over this case for the limited purpose of adjudicating forthcoming attorney fee[s] motions ordered by Magistrate Judge Westmore in her November 2, 2022 Order.” Id. at 2. Plaintiffs Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek International, Inc., Fibrek U.S., Inc.,…