Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. Greenpeace International

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20234:17-cv-02824California1,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RESOLUTE FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., Case No. 17-cv-02824-JST et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION v. REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ATTORNEY FEE MOTIONS AND GREENPEACE INTERNATIONAL, et al., STRIKING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendants. Re: ECF No. 545, 549 Defendants Daniel Brindis, Greenpeace International, Greenpeace, Inc., Amy Moas, and Rolf Skar (collectively “Greenpeace”) filed an administrative motion regarding a briefing schedule on attorney’s fees motions. ECF No. 545. Greenpeace requests that “the Court to maintain jurisdiction over this case for the limited purpose of adjudicating forthcoming attorney fee[s] motions ordered by Magistrate Judge Westmore in her November 2, 2022 Order.” Id. at 2. Plaintiffs Fibrek General Partnership, Fibrek International, Inc., Fibrek U.S., Inc.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.