Asetek Danmark A/S v. Shenzhen Apaltek Co., LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ASETEK DANMARK A/S, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-06179-WHO v. Re: Dtk. No. 89 SHENZHEN APALTEK CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Case No. 23-cv-01079-WHO SHENZHEN APALTEK CO., LTD and GUANGDONG APALTEK LIQUID COOLING TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Re: Dkt. No. 30 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

ASETEK DANMARK A/S,

19 Defendant. 20 Currently before me are motions to dismiss filed by Asetek’s Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) in 21 each of these two related actions. Shenzhen Apaltek Co., Ltd., a/k/a Shenzhen Ang Pai 22 Technology Co., Ltd. and Guangdong Apaltek Liquid Cooling Technology Co., Ltd., a/k/a 23 Guangdong Ang Pai Liquid Cooling Technology Co., Ltd., or Dongguan Apalcool (collectively, 24 “Apaltek”) are not prejudiced because Asetek has provided an expanded covenant not-to-sue in 25 addition to its dismissal of its affirmative claims with prejudice. For the reasons explained below, 26 27 1 I find these matters suitable for…