Singh

Singh v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20235:20-cv-08180California173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAYASHREE SINGH, Case No.20-cv-08 1 80-NC

Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL

— . Re: Dkt. No. 127 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, Defendant.

16 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 || Dated: May 30, 2023 he=————~

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.