Schneider

Schneider v. YouTube, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20233:20-cv-04423California1,503 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARIA SCHNEIDER, et al., Case No. 20-cv-04423-JD

Plaintiffs,

PRETRIAL ORDER NO.

v.

YOUTUBE, LLC, et al., Defendants.

As discussed at the second pretrial conference on June 5, 2023, the Court orders as follows for the jury trial set for June 12, 2023: I. JOINT TRIAL PLAN 1. For the parties’ joint proposed trial plan, the parties agree that the first sentence of Paragraph 4.3 should state that statutory damages will be awarded by the jury on a per work (not per infringement) basis for the six selected works to be tried for plaintiff Schneider’s infringement claims. Dkt. No. 341 ¶ 4.3. The parties agree to try six bellwether infringement works and six bellwether CMI violations, and to apply the damages that may be awarded to the remaining claims on a pro rata basis. Id. ¶¶ 4, 7. In light of these agreements, none of Schneider’s remaining infringement claims or CMI violations will be tried to a jury in this trial or in any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.