J.M.

J.M. v. Miller Creek School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20234:22-cv-06105California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PARENT AND GUARDIAN “SML” ON Case No. 22-cv-06105-DMR

BEHALF OF MINOR SON “JM”

(“STUDENT”) (“SML EX REL JM”),

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, SUBSTITUTE GUARDIAN AD LITEM

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. Re: Dkt. No. 32 MILLER CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 On October 17, 2022, Plaintiff S.M.L. filed a complaint on behalf of her son J.M. She seeks declaratory judgment in connection with California Education Code § 56366 (first claim), appeals two adverse administrative hearing decisions pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (second and third claims), and alleges state law claims for negligence (fourth claim against Defendant Miller Creek School District (“District”)) and breach of contract (fifth claim against Defendant Anova Education and Behavior Consultation, Inc., doing business as Anova Center for Education (“Anova”)). [Docket No. 7 (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)).] On January…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.