Olea

Olea v. Teichert Pipelines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 31, 20234:21-cv-03016California960 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIAZAR OLEA, Case No. 21-cv-03016-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. 9 Re: ECF Nos. 46, 48 TEICHERT PIPELINES, INC., Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Teichert Pipelines, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff Eliazar Olea’s motion for partial summary judgment. ECF Nos. 46, 48. Olea initially filed this action in state court, alleging that Teichert’s disclosure forms concerning background reports are inadequate in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agency Act (“ICRAA”), California’s Consumer Reporting and Agencies Act (“CCRAA”), and California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). ECF No. 1-2. Teichert removed the action to federal court, arguing that the Court has federal question jurisdiction over Olea’s FCRA claim and may exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. ECF No. 1. Teichert now moves for summary judgment, arguing that Olea has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.