Trader Joe's Company v. DesertCart Trading FZE

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20233:23-cv-01148California1,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TRADER JOE’S COMPANY, Case No. 23-cv-01148-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE

v.

MOTION FOR SERVICE OF

PROCESS BY ALTERNATIVE

DESERTCART TRADING FZE, et al., MEANS Defendants.

Plaintiff Trader Joe’s Company (“TJC”) moves ex parte for an order permitting alternative service of the summons and complaint on Defendant Desertcart Trading FZE (“Desertcart”) by email. Mot. (dkt. 15). As explained below, finding this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument, the Court GRANTS TJC’s motion. TJC shall effect service of process on DesertCart by email to support@desertcart.com and legal@desertcart.com by June 16, 2023. I. BACKGROUND TJC sues DesertCart and Piffert Inc.1 for unfair competition and trademark infringement. See Compl. (dkt. 1). DesertCart is an entity based in the United Arab Emirates. Id. ¶ 10. Its website does not provide an address, though the domain name is registered to Rahul Swaminathan at an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.