Christiansen
Christiansen v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KIM CHRISTIANSEN, Case No. 23-cv-01095-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
v. DISMISS
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, et Re: Dkts. No. 10, 11, 24, 25 al., 11 Defendants.
12 Defendants Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Target (collectively, “Defendants”) separately move to dismiss the claims asserted by Plaintiff Kim Christiansen. Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff has not adequately alleged her personal injury claims arising under negligence, strict products liability, and breach of warranty, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED with leave to amend the complaint. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Christiansen alleges that she suffered personal injury from using Cottenelle Flushable Wipes, which she purchased from Target on October 8, 2020. ECF No. 1-1 at 8. Christiansen alleges claims of strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Id. at 9. Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation filed a motion to dismiss for failure…