Christiansen

Christiansen v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20233:23-cv-01095California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KIM CHRISTIANSEN, Case No. 23-cv-01095-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, et Re: Dkts. No. 10, 11, 24, 25 al., 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Target (collectively, “Defendants”) separately move to dismiss the claims asserted by Plaintiff Kim Christiansen. Because the Court concludes that Plaintiff has not adequately alleged her personal injury claims arising under negligence, strict products liability, and breach of warranty, the motions to dismiss are GRANTED with leave to amend the complaint. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Christiansen alleges that she suffered personal injury from using Cottenelle Flushable Wipes, which she purchased from Target on October 8, 2020. ECF No. 1-1 at 8. Christiansen alleges claims of strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty. Id. at 9. Defendant Kimberly-Clark Corporation filed a motion to dismiss for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.