M.T.

M.T. v. Concesionaria Vuela Compania de Aviacion SAPI de CV

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20234:22-cv-03901California1,342 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 M.T., Case No. 22-cv-03901-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING: (1) MOTION TO

APPROVE MINOR’S COMPROMISE

v. AND, (2) MOTION TO SEAL

CONCESIONARIA VUELA COMPANIA Re: Dkt. Nos. 36,

DE AVIACION SAPI DE CV,

11 Defendant.

13 Pending before the Court are the plaintiff’s unopposed (1) motion for approval of minor’s 14 compromise, see Dkt. No. 36 (“Mot.”); and (2) administrative motion to file under seal, see Dkt. 15 No. 38. The Court GRANTS the motion for approval of the minor’s compromise and GRANTS 16 the administrative motion to file under seal.

I. MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF COMPROMISE

18 A. Legal Standard 19 “District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to 20 safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors.” Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 21 (9th Cir. 2011); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c) (providing that district court “must appoint a guardian ad 22 litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.