Emberton

Emberton v. San Francisco City Government

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20233:22-cv-05440California7,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MIHAL EMBERTON, Case No. 22-cv-05440-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS,

v. MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

SAN FRANCISCO CITY GOVERNMENT, Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 28 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant San Francisco City Government’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 25. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (ECF No. 27) and Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 31). Additionally, Plaintiff Emberton has filed a Motion to Recuse the City Attorney’s Office. ECF No. 28. Defendant filed an Opposition (ECF No. 32) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF No. 34). The Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the June 15, 2023 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify.1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.