Lu

Lu v. Vivente 1, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20235:23-cv-02799California3,325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KAI LU, Case No. 23-cv-02799-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

VIVENTE 1, INC., [Re: ECF No. 5] Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Kai Lu’s motion for temporary restraining order (“TRO”). See ECF No. 5 (“Mot.”). On June 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed the instant motion seeking to enjoin Defendant Vivente 1, Inc. (“Vivente”) from evicting her. See Mot. at 2-3. The Court ordered Defendant to file a response. ECF No. 8. On June 12, 2023, Defendant filed an opposition. ECF No. 10. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion for TRO is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Defendant Vivente is the landlord of the residential property at 2400 Enborg Lane #8, San Jose, CA 95118 (“Premises”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”) at 1. Plaintiff originally leased Unit #26 subject to a written lease. See Declaration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.