Stebbins

Stebbins v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20233:23-cv-00321California1,605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID A. STEBBINS, Case No. 23-cv-00321-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

v. PROPER VENUE

JOHN DOE, Defendant.

Self-represented Plaintiff David A. Stebbins filed a complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on January 10, 2023. [Docket Nos. 1, 2.] Plaintiff also filed a “petition for issuance of subpoena duces tecum.” [Docket No. 6.] The petition sought leave to serve a subpoena on a third party, Google LLC, to determine the identity and address of Defendant John Doe. On May 22, 2023, the court granted Plaintiff’s IFP application and explained that it would first review Plaintiff’s petition for issuance of subpoena duces tecum prior to screening the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. [Docket No. 10.] The court then denied the petition without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to file a new request addressing the deficiencies identified in its order. Plaintiff subsequently filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.