Gamevice, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GAMEVICE, INC.,
Case No. 18-cv-01942-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION NINTENDO CO., LTD., et al., 13 Defendants.
15 I. INTRODUCTION On March 14, 2023, Nintendo’s motion for summary judgment was granted in part and denied in part. See Dkt. 245 (“Order”). The order held invalid many of Gamevice’s asserted claims on the grounds that they were anticipated by prior art (namely, the Nintendo Switch). Shortly thereafter, Gamevice sought leave to file a motion for reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 7- 9(b)(3). See Dkt. 246 (“Mot.”). Leave was granted, and the parties each filed additional briefs. See Dkt. 248 (“Nintendo Br.”); Dkt. 249 (“Gamevice Reply”). Gamevice argues the March 14 order erred by failing to analyze individually the validity of the asserted claims. After careful review of the parties’ briefing and relevant legal authorities, the motion is…