Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20233:22-cv-00529California1,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 22-cv-00529-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. THIRD MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINIING

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., ORDER Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action. Plaintiff Michael Harris alleges that he is “a convicted child rapist and molester 19 times over,” Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”) ¶ 43, and claims that his safety is put at risk by a potential transfer from sensitive needs custody at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”) to a non-designated yard at another facility, see generally, id. Mr. Harris claims that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) intends to transfer him to another facility because he has been classified as a Level 2 inmate, and SVSP’s sensitive needs yard has been designated Level 3. See id. ¶¶ 21, 32, 43. Mr. Harris filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.