Osinek

Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20233:13-cv-03891California3,215 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. Case No. 13-cv-03891-EMC

RONDA OSINEK,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS TAYLOR’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT KAISER PERMANENTE, et al., Docket No. 250 Defendants. 12 13 This litigation covers claims brought against various Kaiser entities pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA”). Currently, there are complaints filed by three sets of Plaintiffs: (1) the United States; (2) Dr. James Taylor; and (3) Gloryanne Bryant and Victoria M. Hernandez. This order addresses a motion to dismiss challenging Dr. Taylor’s operative complaint. For convenience, the Court refers to the Kaiser entities moving for dismissal as “Kaiser.” The specific Kaiser entities that have been sued by Dr. Taylor are: (1) Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.; (2) Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado; and (3) Colorado…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.