Canton

Canton v. U.S. Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20233:22-cv-04226California4,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRIAN CANTON, Case No. 22-cv-04226-TLT (LJC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PARTIES’ JOINT

v. STATEMENT OF DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

U.S. FOODS, INC., Re: ECF No. 35 Defendant.

12 This case involves employment discrimination, retaliation, and constructive discharge claims. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Statement of Discovery Dispute Regarding Defendant U.S. Foods, Inc.’s (US Foods) Subpoenas for Plaintiff Brian Canton’s Medical Records (Joint Discovery Statement). ECF No. 35. The Court construes the parties’ discovery dispute as a motion by Plaintiff Mr. Canton to quash US Food’s subpoenas under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3)(A). Having read the parties’ submissions and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, including that presented at the Court’s hearing on the dispute, for the reasons explained below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Mr. Canton’s motion to quash. The Court finds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.