Cortez

Cortez v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20234:22-cv-07332California2,527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALBERTO C. CORTEZ, Case No. 22-cv-07332-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE Re: Dkt. No.

SERVICES, INC.,

11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Alberto Cortez (“Cortez” or “Plaintiff”) brought this putative class action against Defendant Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc. (“Cambridge” or “Defendant”), alleging ten causes of action related to Cortez’s employment with Cambridge, including both individual and class claims. Dkt. No. 12-2 at 1-2 (“Sachs Decl.”). Cambridge moves to compel Cortez to arbitrate his claims as required by an arbitration agreement (the “Agreement”). See Dkt. No. 12 (“Mot.”). Cortez opposes. See Dkt. No. 13 (“Opp.”) at 1. The Court GRANTS Cambridge’s motion to compel arbitration.1 I. BACKGROUND On April 1, 2019, Cambridge, a property management service business, hired Cortez. Dkt. No. 12-1 at 2 (“Cooper Decl.”). On the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.