Cortez
Cortez v. Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ALBERTO C. CORTEZ, Case No. 22-cv-07332-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
v. ARBITRATION
CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE Re: Dkt. No.
SERVICES, INC.,
11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Alberto Cortez (“Cortez” or “Plaintiff”) brought this putative class action against Defendant Cambridge Real Estate Services, Inc. (“Cambridge” or “Defendant”), alleging ten causes of action related to Cortez’s employment with Cambridge, including both individual and class claims. Dkt. No. 12-2 at 1-2 (“Sachs Decl.”). Cambridge moves to compel Cortez to arbitrate his claims as required by an arbitration agreement (the “Agreement”). See Dkt. No. 12 (“Mot.”). Cortez opposes. See Dkt. No. 13 (“Opp.”) at 1. The Court GRANTS Cambridge’s motion to compel arbitration.1 I. BACKGROUND On April 1, 2019, Cambridge, a property management service business, hired Cortez. Dkt. No. 12-1 at 2 (“Cooper Decl.”). On the same…