Brumble

Brumble v. Andrew M. Jordan, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20233:23-cv-01336California2,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KERWYN BRUMBLE,

Case No. 23-cv-01336-RS Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO v. REMAND FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, GRANTING MOTION

ANDREW M. JORDAN, INC., FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, DECLINING TO Defendant. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER REMAINING

CLAIMS AND REMANDING THOSE

CLAIMS TO STATE COURT

17 I. INTRODUCTION This is a putative class action asserting wage and hour claims on behalf of non-exempt employees of defendant Andrew M. Jordan, Inc., a construction company that provides a “full array of construction and civil engineering services” in Northern California. Named plaintiff Kerwyn Brumble began working for Jordan in 2019 under the job title “laborer.” Brumble’s complaint, filed originally in Alameda…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.