Gipson

Gipson v. Ascencio

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20233:22-cv-09054California1,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FAITDON GIPSON,

Case No. 22-cv-09054 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

AND OF SERVICE; DIRECTING

v. DEFENDANTS TO FILE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

T. ASCENCIO, et al., NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO

Defendants. CLERK

16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. On April 27, 2023, the Court screened the complaint and found it stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment again Defendants Ascencio, Mora, and Dossman-Perez. Dkt. No. 11 at 2. However, there were no factual allegations against named Defendant Officer C. Casillas. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint to correct this deficiency or file notice that he wishes to proceed solely on the cognizable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.