Gipson
Gipson v. Ascencio
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20233:22-cv-09054California1,546 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FAITDON GIPSON,
Case No. 22-cv-09054 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
AND OF SERVICE; DIRECTING
v. DEFENDANTS TO FILE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR
T. ASCENCIO, et al., NOTICE REGARDING SUCH
MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO
Defendants. CLERK
16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). Dkt. No. 1. On April 27, 2023, the Court screened the complaint and found it stated a cognizable claim under the Eighth Amendment again Defendants Ascencio, Mora, and Dossman-Perez. Dkt. No. 11 at 2. However, there were no factual allegations against named Defendant Officer C. Casillas. Id. Accordingly, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint to correct this deficiency or file notice that he wishes to proceed solely on the cognizable…