Johnson v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20235:21-cv-06202California6,322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 RICHARD JOHNSON, Case No. 5:21-cv-06202-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT; GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR

7-ELEVEN, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DISMISSING

STATE LAW CLAIM WITHOUT

Defendants. PREJUDICE Re: ECF No.

Pending before this Court are Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20) and Defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 30). The Court heard the parties on June 1, 2023. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion and GRANTS in part Defendants’ cross motion. The Court also declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claim and DISMISSES the state law claim for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Richard Johnson initiated this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.