In re HIV Antitrust Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION. Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC
ORDER RE TRIAL WITNESS
DISCLOSURES Docket No. 1977
12 13 The parties have submitted disputes related to exhibits to be used with the defense expert Ms. O’Malley. The Court rules as follows. • Exhibit 5150. This exhibit is (in effect) the Merchant & Gould opinion. The objections are overruled. In her expert report, Ms. O’Malley did give some opinions on the Merchant & Gould opinion, even if she largely relied on Dr. Berkland’s evaluation of the Merchant & Gould opinion. See, e.g., O’Malley Rpt. ¶ 246 (“Mr. Lentz’s reliance on legal opinion letters from Merchant & Gould does not change my opinion. The Merchant & Gould opinion letters are a legal evaluation of Teva’s defenses to infringement of Gilead’s patents. They are not a replacement for litigation where both side’s arguments and…