Flat
Flat v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES FLAT, Case No. 23-cv-00725-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Docket No. 13 Defendant.
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION On July 28, 2012, Plaintiff purchased a 2012 Ford F-350 vehicle (the “Vehicle”). See Docket No. 1, Ex. A (“Compl.”) ¶ 10. In connection with the purchase, Plaintiff received an express 3-year/36,000 mile bumper-to-bumper warranty and a 5-year/60,000 mile powertrain warranty. Id. ¶ 9; see Docket No. 17 (“Opp’n”) at 1; Docket No. 1, Ex. C (“Sales Contract”). Nearly ten years later, on June 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed a complaint asserting various causes of action against Ford, including breach of express warranty and implied warranty in violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song-Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 1790, et seq. See Compl. ¶¶ 31–52. Now pending is Ford’s motion for judgment…