Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20235:22-cv-04844California896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE JUNE 15, 2023

DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

v. CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS;

ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 116, 117

13 Plaintiff Nicky Laatz and defendant Zazzle, Inc. (“Zazzle”) dispute whether Zazzle is entitled to a protective order limiting access to certain portions of the deposition transcript of Zazzle’s CTO Robert Beaver III. Dkt. No. 116. The Court held a hearing on the matter on June 20, 2023. Dkt. No. 119. In advance of Mr. Beaver’s deposition, the parties entered into a stipulation regarding the handling of confidential testimony. See Dkt. No. 116-1. That stipulation contemplated that testimony could be designated “confidential” or “highly confidential – attorneys’ eyes only,” depending on its sensitivity and the risk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.