Kelly
Kelly v. Cubesmart
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CYNTHIA RENEE KELLY, Case No. 22-cv-05470-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE, GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND DENYING
CUBESMART, et al., MISCELLANEOUS MOTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 18, 19, 21, 26, 27, 33, 45, 57, 61, 73, 75, 81, 82, 83, 86 12 Before the Court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss and to strike, as well as several motions filed by Plaintiff, who is representing herself. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS the Lewis Brisbois Defendants’ motion, Dkt. No. 33, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the CubeSmart Defendants’ motion, Dkt. No. 27, and DENIES Plaintiff’s motions, Dkt. Nos. 16, 18–19, 21, 26, 45, 57, 61, 73, 75, 81–83, 86. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s case arises out of the sale of her personal property at…